![]() |
![]()
|
Conducting Empirical Analysis: Public Opinion in Action Conducting Empirical Analysis is an ideal way to marry substance with skills, getting students to experience the joy of discovery firsthand. Through straightforward instruction and guided examples, Clawson and Oxley show students how to conduct web-based data analysis using UC Berkeley’s Survey Documentation and Analysis (available online for free) to answer questions about party identification or attitude stability, and to measure racial prejudice and political knowledge. Exercises cover a range of data collection techniques, survey research, and statistical analyses, ramping up from multiple-choice and open-ended questions to mini-research projects. An instructor’s guide with solutions is available for adopters.
Formats Available from CQ Press
New to this Edition Not applicable; this is the first edition of this work.CQ Press is pleased to comply with the Higher Education Opportunity Act. Please email heoacompliance@cqpress.com for additional information that may be available. Be sure to include your name, contact information, academic affiliation, and the title, author, and edition of the book in question. Contact us at collegesales@cqpress.com if we may assist you in your book selection or if you have feedback to share. Thank you for your consideration of CQ Press books. CQ Press, a Division of SAGE Publications, Inc.
2300 N Street, NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Table of Contents Tables and Figures 1. Introduction to Conducting Empirical Analysis Using SDA Web-based Software Conclusion and Looking Ahead 2. Political Socialization
3. Mass Media
4. Attitude Stability and Attitude Change
5. Political Ideology
6. Pluralistic Roots of Public Opinion
7. Political Knowledge
8. Support for Civil Liberties
9. Support for Civil Rights
10. Trust in Government and Social Capital
11. Impact of Public Opinion on Policy
12. Public Opinion and the 2008 Election
Reference Appendix
Testimonials The exercises are well structured, and Clawson and Oxley provide very clear instructions on how to complete them. The questions included in the exercises seek to balance interpretation and critical thinking–helping students get at what the numbers tell us about the relationship between two variables and why that relationship exists. I like the hands-on approach, and I think the exercises address topics that students will find interesting and engaging. - Erin Cassese, West Virginia University - Paul Goren, University of Minnesota - Laurie Rice, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Bio(s)
Rosalee A. Clawson, Purdue University Rosalee A. Clawson is professor of political science at Purdue University. Her research focuses on public opinion, mass media and politics, political psychology, and the politics of race, class, and gender. Her work has been published in the American Political Science Review, Public Opinion Quarterly, Political Research Quarterly, Political Communication, Journal of Black Studies, Judicature, and Social Science Quarterly. She is the co-author of Legacy and Legitimacy: Black Americans and the Supreme Court and Conducting Empirical Analysis: Public Opinion in Action. Zoe M. Oxley, Union College Zoe M. Oxley is associate professor of political science at Union College. Her research interests include the effects of the media on public opinion, new media and political knowledge, political psychology, and women in electoral politics. She is the co-author of Conducting Empirical Analysis: Public Opinion in Action. Her work has also been published in the American Political Science Review, Journal of Politics, Politics & Gender, Political Research Quarterly, Political Behavior, Judicature, and PS: Political Science and Politics. Ancillaries Instructor's Resources available! http://college.cqpress.com/Sites/Default.aspx?alias=college.cqpress.com/sites/clawsonoxley Resources include an instructor's manual, a solutions manual, and mini-research project rubrics. |
||||




