CQ Press CQ Press: An imprint of SAGE
Shopping Cart Shopping Cart
Product Divisions

College

Government/ Professional

Library/Reference

Resources

Free Trials

Exam/Desk Copies

Sign up for our Catalogs

Proposal Guidelines

Out of Print Titles

Permissions/Accessibility

Government Contract Information

Customer Service

Search our Bookstore

Ordering/Account Support

Terms and Conditions

Online Product Assistance

Contact Us

Press Releases

SAGE Publications

CQ Researcher
Log InSign Up for a Free TrialSearch Researcher
             
Cover Image: CQ Researcher Asbestos Litigation v. 13-17
  • Date: 05/02/2003
  • Format: Electronic PDF
  • Price: $15.00

  • Format: Single Copy
  • Price: $15.00
Bookmark and Share

CQ Researcher Asbestos Litigation v. 13-17
Kenneth Jost, The CQ Researcher


Asbestos was widely used for decades in the United States even though it was linked to cancer and other serious diseases. Over the past 30 years, people exposed to asbestos have flooded the courts with suits seeking monetary damages for their injuries. Asbestos use has been drastically reduced, but claims continue to increase annually by the tens of thousands. Business groups want Congress to solve the “litigation crisis” that already has cost $54 billion and could cost $210 billion more. One plan would create a $100 billion trust fund to pay victims; another would put a hold on claims from people who are not already sick. Trial-lawyer and labor groups say a trust fund might work if adequately financed, but closed-door negotiations on Capitol Hill have yet to produce a consensus.

Bio(s)
Kenneth Jost, The CQ Researcher

Kenneth Jost is Supreme Court editor, CQ Press; associate editor, CQ Researcher; and author of The Supreme Court Yearbook since the 1992-1993 edition. 

Sample Pages