CQ Press CQ Press: An imprint of SAGE
Shopping Cart Shopping Cart
Product Divisions

College

Government/ Professional

Library/Reference

Resources

Free Trials

Exam/Desk Copies

Sign up for our Catalogs

Proposal Guidelines

Out of Print Titles

Permissions/Accessibility

Government Contract Information

Customer Service

Search our Bookstore

Ordering/Account Support

Terms and Conditions

Online Product Assistance

Contact Us

Press Releases

SAGE Publications

CQ Researcher
Log InSign Up for a Free TrialSearch Researcher
             
Cover Image: CQ Researcher Bilingual Education vs. English Immersion v.19-43
  • Date: 12/11/2009
  • Format: Electronic PDF
  • Price: $15.00

  • Format: Single Copy
  • Price: $15.00
Bookmark and Share

CQ Researcher Bilingual Education vs. English Immersion v.19-43
Kenneth Jost, The CQ Researcher


More than 5 million public school students have limited English proficiency, and the number is growing. Most English learners enter school behind fluent English speakers, and many never catch up either in language or other academic areas. In the 1960s and '70s, the federal government supported bilingual education: teaching English learners in both their native language and in English. A backlash developed in the 1980s and '90s among critics who attacked bilingual education as academically ineffective and politically divisive. They favored instead some form of "English immersion." Educators and policy makers continue to wage bitter debates on the issue, with each of the opposing camps claiming that research studies support its position. Some experts say the debate should focus instead on providing more resources, including more and better-trained teachers.

Bio(s)
Kenneth Jost, The CQ Researcher

Kenneth Jost is Supreme Court editor, CQ Press; associate editor, CQ Researcher; and author of The Supreme Court Yearbook since the 1992-1993 edition. 

Sample Pages