CQ Press CQ Press: An imprint of SAGE
Shopping Cart Shopping Cart
Product Divisions

College

Government/ Professional

Library/Reference

Resources

Free Trials

Exam/Desk Copies

Sign up for our Catalogs

Proposal Guidelines

Out of Print Titles

Permissions/Accessibility

Government Contract Information

Customer Service

Search our Bookstore

Ordering/Account Support

Terms and Conditions

Online Product Assistance

Contact Us

Press Releases

SAGE Publications

CQ Researcher
Log InSign Up for a Free TrialSearch Researcher
             
Cover Image: CQ Researcher Property Rights v.15-9
  • Date: 03/04/2005
  • Format: Single Copy
  • Price: $15.00

  • Format: Electronic PDF
  • Price: $15.00
Bookmark and Share

CQ Researcher Property Rights v.15-9
Kenneth Jost, The CQ Researcher


State and local governments are under increasing criticism for using the long-established power of eminent domain to acquire private property not only for highways and other government projects but also for private developments. Financially strapped cities say eminent domain, or condemnation, is sometimes the only way to assemble large tracts of land for upscale residential and commercial development that will enhance urban life and bring in needed tax revenue. Property-rights advocates and other critics say the government should not force home and business owners to turn over their property to other private parties. The Supreme Court is considering the issue in a case pitting the distressed city of New London, Conn., against a group of homeowners who refuse to make way for a private development. The justices seemed skeptical of the homeowners' position during oral arguments in February. But some experts say property-rights advocates are causing municipalities to be more careful about using eminent domain in residential areas.

Bio(s)
Kenneth Jost, The CQ Researcher

Kenneth Jost is Supreme Court editor, CQ Press; associate editor, CQ Researcher; and author of The Supreme Court Yearbook since the 1992-1993 edition. 

Sample Pages