CQ Press CQ Press: An imprint of SAGE
Shopping Cart Shopping Cart
Product Divisions

College

Government/ Professional

Library/Reference

Resources

Free Trials

Exam/Desk Copies

Sign up for our Catalogs

Proposal Guidelines

Out of Print Titles

Permissions/Accessibility

Government Contract Information

Customer Service

Search our Bookstore

Ordering/Account Support

Terms and Conditions

Online Product Assistance

Contact Us

Press Releases

SAGE Publications

CQ Researcher
Log InSign Up for a Free TrialSearch Researcher
             
Cover Image: CQ Researcher Rethinking the Death Penalty v.11-40
  • Date: 11/16/2001
  • Format: Single Copy
  • Price: $15.00
  • ISBN: 0140

  • Format: Electronic PDF
  • Price: $15.00
  • ISBN: P0140
Bookmark and Share

CQ Researcher Rethinking the Death Penalty v.11-40
Kenneth Jost, The CQ Researcher


Most Americans still favor the death penalty, but support has declined in the past five years. Critics point to documented attacks on the reliability and fairness of court procedures in capital cases. They claim too many death sentences are reversed on appeal and that flaws in the system, including inadequate defense counsels, create an unacceptable risk of executing an innocent person. Supporters of capital punishment say legal safeguards are adequate and that no innocent person has been put to death in recent years. The changing climate can be seen in the enactment of state laws to limit the death penalty and in cases before the Supreme Court, which is set to decide whether it is unconstitutional to execute mentally retarded offenders.

Bio(s)
Kenneth Jost, The CQ Researcher

Kenneth Jost is Supreme Court editor, CQ Press; associate editor, CQ Researcher; and author of The Supreme Court Yearbook since the 1992-1993 edition. 

Sample Pages